Deep Mapping
At Avery Gordon’s
seminar during the question time at the end, Geoff was describing all
the different methods we were using in order to identify social
haunting and get at the utopian margins. He seemed to be struggling
to sum it all up in a pithy way. But if we had mobilised a similar
range of methods in exploration of landscape or place, as people have
often done, then we might describe it as a deep map.
“Reflecting
eighteenth century antiquarian approaches to place, which included
history, folklore, natural history and hearsay, the deep map attempts
to record and represent the grain and patina of place through
juxtapositions and interpenetrations of the historical and the
contemporary, the political and the poetic, the discursive and the
sensual; the conflation of oral testimony, anthology, memoir,
biography, natural history and everything you might ever want to say
about a place …” Pearson & Shanks 2001.
Theatre/Archaeology: p64-65
In one of the most
famous deep maps, PrairyErth, William
Least Heat-Moon explores the
life of a single Kansas county, exploring its social and natural
history, its people and places, its customs, traditions, folklore and
gossip. His account is not
overly theoretical or academic, rather it relies on his keen
observation and almost obsessive attention to detail. As one reviewer
pointed out, nothing goes unrecorded. And while that reviewer saw
this as a flaw in the work, it is also its strength. To understand a
place, we have to get to know it, we have to immerse ourselves in it.
Many generations of landscape
historians/archaeologists have said exactly the same thing: the
‘muddy boots’ school remains strong many decades after it was
pioneered by people like W. G. Hoskins and M. W. Beresford. You can’t simply look at documents, they argued, you have to get out there. You have to see the landscape, the lie of the land, the innumerable hints to the past just waiting to be discovered by those who take time to look.
To
me, our GhostLabs are the 'muddy boots’ method for exploring social
haunting. And while we are
lacking one crucial thing on this project, time, even just our short
exploratory ventures, our excavations of the present, have begun to reveal things concerning the
nature of haunting: its relationships with place, memory and emotion.
Toby Pillatt